Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 04:41

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Horoscope for Thursday, June 12, 2025 - Chicago Sun-Times
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
ChatGPT future just revealed — get ready for a ‘super assistant’ - Tom's Guide
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Russia can stop this any time.
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
What’s next?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Oral Bacteria Diversity Linked to Depression Symptoms - Neuroscience News
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Red Sox To Acquire Jorge Alcala - MLB Trade Rumors
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.